GORDON vs. May 21, 2013W.D.N.Y. No. 08–CV–378S(F)
Defendants are going to use predictive coding to review 200k - 300k emails
Plaintiffs file motion to compel defendant to negotiate the predictive coding protocol
Defendants argue that courts do not require parties to agree to protocols
Plaintiffs want access to the seed documents used to train the computer (citing Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, 287 F.R.D. 182(S.D.N.Y. 2012)
Defendants contend that Mooredoes not direct parties to provide the seed sets
Plaintiffs ask the court to remind defendant of its FRCP 34(a) obligations ediscovery101 Rule 34(a) A party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b)
Plaintiff's motion to compel meet and confer is dismissed without prejudice. Judge says: No No No Yes Yes Yes font: magnus@formfett.net